chx
i don't know about that poster nor did i read up about ID but what I'd
like to know, how much did we evolve in the last 5 000 years. anyone
care to enlighten me?
i mean, we cannot even evolve to be flu free after so many millennia
of exposure to them little brats!!!
On Aug 19, 10:46 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> The sad thing is that the whole ID movement is essentially
> complicating that basic argument.
> On Aug 19, 2:44 pm, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You can't really ask for a better argument than that, honestly. All
> > they have to do is show up and everyone just laughs them out of the
> > room.
> > On Aug 19, 4:33 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> chx
> i don't know about that poster nor did i read up about ID but what I'd
> like to know, how much did we evolve in the last 5 000 years. anyone
> care to enlighten me?
> i mean, we cannot even evolve to be flu free after so many millennia
> of exposure to them little brats!!!
> On Aug 19, 10:46 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > The sad thing is that the whole ID movement is essentially
> > complicating that basic argument.
> > On Aug 19, 2:44 pm, rappoccio <rappoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You can't really ask for a better argument than that, honestly. All
> > > they have to do is show up and everyone just laughs them out of the
> > > room.
> > > On Aug 19, 4:33 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> i don't know about that poster nor did i read up about ID but what I'd
> like to know, how much did we evolve in the last 5 000 years. anyone
> care to enlighten me?
> i mean, we cannot even evolve to be flu free after so many millennia
> of exposure to them little brats!!!
Duh. The viruses have evolved so our immune system cannot recognize
and defeat them.
Sheesh, where were you in grade school science class?
I hate seeing stuff like that in news papers, I'm always fearful that
they skipped over a better letter just to post that drivel instead of
writing back to the author a quick message like:
The theory of evolution does not posit that if you have faith "your
seeds will grow into different plants", then they will, your argument
is therefore fallacious and I will not be putting it into print to
save you from embarrassment.
On Aug 19, 1:33 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
It's the "Fair and Balanced" fallacy. It implies that just because
there is massive disagreement on a subject, there are two valid points
of view, and it somehow it becomes a matter of "opinion".
On Aug 19, 8:07 pm, Dag Yo <sir_ro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I hate seeing stuff like that in news papers, I'm always fearful that
> they skipped over a better letter just to post that drivel instead of
> writing back to the author a quick message like:
> The theory of evolution does not posit that if you have faith "your
> seeds will grow into different plants", then they will, your argument
> is therefore fallacious and I will not be putting it into print to
> save you from embarrassment.
> On Aug 19, 1:33 pm, Dev <thedevil...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:09 am, Medusa <Medusa4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Checkers;
> > i don't know about that poster nor did i read up about ID but what I'd
> > like to know, how much did we evolve in the last 5 000 years. anyone
> > care to enlighten me?
> > i mean, we cannot even evolve to be flu free after so many millennia
> > of exposure to them little brats!!!
> Duh. The viruses have evolved so our immune system cannot recognize
> and defeat them.
chx
so what you are saying is that a dead brainless virus can evolve when
we humans with over 200 000 genes cannot keep up to dead scraps of a
broken incomplete gene that can only have meaning within our cells.
without our cells as hosts they are nothing but dust. are you implying
that they are alive?
> Sheesh, where were you in grade school science class?
