From: Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 30 2008 9:58 pm
Subject: Re: Is it wrong to defend "good" theists
On Jun 30, 9:39 am, bob600 <b...@nireland.com> wrote:
> First my position, I am what most would consider a “strong” atheist, I
You aren't depriving anyone of their freedom to err by pointing out
> “know” God does not exist, that in itself has attracted some attacks, > so I would ask that you let it pass this one time. I have lived in the > heart of a divided society for 25 years, a society, given my position > in it, that tested my religious affiliations robustly and daily. So > on a daily and personal basis I experienced the “very bad” side of > religion. Nevertheless, and despite my strong non beliefs, I happily > accept and defend other people’s right to think differently. > For some time now I have been attacked for taking that position
> Why is it so wrong to defend the “nice” theists who do me no harm,
> Believe it or not I ask this with an open mind, and if I my position
> I leave you with an apt quote from Mahatma Gandhi, 1931:-
> “Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err. It
their errors. You can happilly accept and defend other people's rights to think differently while criticizing the thoughts that they are free to have. The "nice" theists who do you no harm are doing all of us harm by
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||