Hi Mr. Wood
On Dec 1, 8:26 am, w...@itd.nrl.navy.mil (J. B. Wood) wrote:
> Hello, all, and while I understand the math behind and use of the above in
> vector analysis, I can't figure out why vector components are labeled as
> such.
> The fact that a vector in space can be represented in space in two ways
> (via the metric tensor) as either with "contravariant" components and one
> set of basis vectors or with "covariant" components with reciprocal basis
> vectors is clear. But what are the vector components varying "with" or
> "against"? It appears these terms are arbitrary. Thanks for your time
> and comment. Sincerely,
> John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail: w...@itd.nrl.navy.mil
> Naval Research Laboratory
> 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
> Washington, DC 20375-5337
In physics, covariant is demo'd by Planck's "h",
h = erg*sec * (a scalar ~ 6.6x10^27)
h=h' , meaning h is invariant,
h == erg'*sec'
therefore
erg*sec = erg'*sec'
so
erg' = (sec/sec') * erg
OTOH, the speed of light "c" is also an invariant,
c = c', but transforms contravariantly,
c = meter/sec * (a scalar ~ 3*10^8)
c == meter'/sec'
meter' = (sec'/sec) * meter.
Take note the erg uses (sec/sec') to transform,
but the meter uses (sec'/sec), which is a very
important difference, that became evident in
the 1983 definition of the meter,
http://physics.trak4.com/modern-spacetime.pdf
and then furthermore at this link,
http://physics.trak4.com/
is Modern SpaceTime (MST) articles in briefs,
proving the redefinition of the meter is in
accord with General Relativity.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker