Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion A set of approximations the central binomial coefficient
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Rob Johnson  
View profile
 More options Jul 8, 11:08 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: r...@trash.whim.org (Rob Johnson)
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:08:04 GMT
Local: Tues, Jul 8 2008 11:08 pm
Subject: Re: A set of approximations the central binomial coefficient
In article <20080706103816.687...@newsreader.com>,
David W. Cantrell <DWCantr...@sigmaxi.net> wrote:

>"sa...@kt-algorithms.com" <sa...@kt-algorithms.com> wrote:
>> An interesting type of approximation to the central binomial
>> coefficient is of the form:

>>   C(2n, n) ~=  4^n / sqrt( Rm(n) )

>> Rm being a rational function of max. degree m+1 (m>0):

>>   Rm(n) = (pi n^(m+1) + sum(i=0,m) Pi n^i) / (n^m + sum(i=0,m-1) Qi n^i)

>> and where the 2m+1 coefficients are defined by simply requiring exact
>> results for 2m>=n>=0; note that C(0,0)=1 implies that Q0=P0.

>Hello, Knud!

>Yes, your form of approximation is nice.

>FWIW, here are simple upper and lower bounds for C(2n, n).

>Upper bound: 4^n / sqrt(pi(n + 1/4))                             (Ub)

>Lower bound: Ub * (1 - 1/(8(n + 1/4))^2)                         (Lb)

>Your approximations are precise for small n, while the relative errors of
>my bounds at n = 0 are roughly 13% and -15%, resp. But for large n, those
>bounds make reasonably good approximations. For example, at n = 50, their
>relative errors are about 6*10^-6 and -4*10^-10, resp.

Using Stirling's assymptotic series, we get that the central binomial
coefficient is assymptotically

       4^n            1       1         5          21
    ---------- ( 1 - --- + ------- + -------- - --------- - ... )
    sqrt(pi n)       8 n   128 n^2   1024 n^3   32768 n^4

which, using the first 3 terms, gives

n   C(2n,n) approximation
-   ------- -------------
1   2       1.99229446690301
2   6       5.99660115228404
3   20      19.9965102093602
4   70      69.9947702088935
5   252     251.990291239197

Multiply by sqrt(1 + 1/(4n)) / sqrt(1 + 1/(4n)) to get

          4^n               1         1         3
    --------------- ( 1 - ------ + ------- - -------- - ... )
    sqrt(pi(n+1/4))       64 n^2   128 n^3   8192 n^4

Substituting m = n+1/4, we get

        4^m             1         21
    ----------- ( 1 - ------ + -------- - ... )
    sqrt(2pi m)       64 m^2   8192 m^4

Using one and two terms in the series, we get your approximations.
When n = 0, the third term throws things awry as is often the case
with assymptotic expansions.

The interesting part is that out to the 1/m^50 term, the series is
even.  This would indicate that C(2m-1/2,m-1/4) 4^{-m} sqrt(m) is
even.  I have not had a chance to look into this yet.

Rob Johnson <r...@trash.whim.org>
take out the trash before replying
to view any ASCII art, display article in a monospaced font


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google