Are you saying all the suicide bombers are just havign a big orgy up there with each other?
Advertisement
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu May 20, 2010 5:03 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Ranasse » Thu May 20, 2010 5:03 pm
There's a difference between free speech and hate speech.
by Rhodmhire » Thu May 20, 2010 5:04 pm
Angoila wrote:what if I went out into the street and said Jesus sucks donkey balls. You could turn violent, but on the other hand its freedom of speech, so that makes it right?
some of you are wrong for the right reasons...
and some of you are right for the wrong reasons
by Tekania » Thu May 20, 2010 5:05 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:
Are you saying all the suicide bombers are just havign a big orgy up there with each other?
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu May 20, 2010 5:06 pm
Angoila wrote:what if I went out into the street and said Jesus sucks donkey balls. You could turn violent, but on the other hand its freedom of speech, so that makes it right?
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Mad hatters in jeans » Thu May 20, 2010 5:07 pm
by The Corparation » Thu May 20, 2010 5:07 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Rhodmhire » Thu May 20, 2010 5:08 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Angoila wrote:what if I went out into the street and said Jesus sucks donkey balls. You could turn violent, but on the other hand its freedom of speech, so that makes it right?
I dunno, sounds kinda typical. I mean not 'sucks donkey balls' but the sentiment itself is far from unusual. I'm not sure what you mean by 'you could turn violent' you could, but that'd be illegal, and only makes those criticizing your religion look all the more correct.
by Rhodmhire » Thu May 20, 2010 5:09 pm
by Andaluciae » Thu May 20, 2010 5:09 pm
Angoila wrote:what if I went out into the street and said Jesus sucks donkey balls. You could turn violent, but on the other hand its freedom of speech, so that makes it right?
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by Mad hatters in jeans » Thu May 20, 2010 5:10 pm
by Andaluciae » Thu May 20, 2010 5:13 pm
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by Unidox » Thu May 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Caninope wrote:It's NSG. The 20th Circle of LIMBO!
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Always here to ruin the day. 8)
Living Freedom Land wrote:Oh, so now you want gay people to take part in the sacred institution of tax rebates too? You liberals sicken me.
Lacadaemon wrote:I mean, hell, in a properly regulated market, pension stripping schemes like Zynga wouldn't ever have a sniff of an IPO (see Groupon). But it's all wild westy now. Lie down with dogs and so forth.
by Aryavartha » Thu May 20, 2010 5:22 pm
Islamic Hazarastan wrote:If a magazine printed pictures making fun of blacks or hispanics, it would be immediately condemned as racism and bigotry.
When people make fun of us, it is justified as freedom of speech.
Islamic Hazarastan wrote:For example, Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was mentioned in Hindu and Zoroastrian teachings.
by Scarsaw » Thu May 20, 2010 5:22 pm
by Jordaxia » Thu May 20, 2010 5:26 pm
by Unidox » Thu May 20, 2010 5:39 pm
Jordaxia wrote:A lot of people don't get the point, huh? It's really simple. The point of -everybody- drawing muhammed is because there are a group of muslims out there, not all of them, who think they can intimidate people into not. See: Comedy Central, Theo Van Gogh, who is -dead- because of this, and the Danish cartoonist who survived an axe attack. If everybody draws muhammed, the threat's hollow. That group can't kill everyone. That's why it's important.
Caninope wrote:It's NSG. The 20th Circle of LIMBO!
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Always here to ruin the day. 8)
Living Freedom Land wrote:Oh, so now you want gay people to take part in the sacred institution of tax rebates too? You liberals sicken me.
Lacadaemon wrote:I mean, hell, in a properly regulated market, pension stripping schemes like Zynga wouldn't ever have a sniff of an IPO (see Groupon). But it's all wild westy now. Lie down with dogs and so forth.
by Rhodmhire » Thu May 20, 2010 5:39 pm
by Rhodmhire » Thu May 20, 2010 5:41 pm
Jordaxia wrote:A lot of people don't get the point, huh? It's really simple. The point of -everybody- drawing muhammed is because there are a group of muslims out there, not all of them, who think they can intimidate people into not. See: Comedy Central, Theo Van Gogh, who is -dead- because of this, and the Danish cartoonist who survived an axe attack. If everybody draws muhammed, the threat's hollow. That group can't kill everyone. That's why it's important.
by The Rich Port » Thu May 20, 2010 5:42 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:Here's a fun how-to video for those of you who aren't so sure of how to draw Muhammad.
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu May 20, 2010 5:52 pm
Unidox wrote:
That reminds me Jesus is mentioned and seen as a prophet in the Qur'an. So why are we ("The West") allowed to mock him so openly, but not another more prolific prophet?
Futhermore, naming your child Muhammad seems a bit ballsy. Then to go as far to rename a danish as a 'Muhammad rose' seems even worse than simply depicting the Prophet.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by South Norwega » Thu May 20, 2010 6:19 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Rhodmhire wrote:Here's a fun how-to video for those of you who aren't so sure of how to draw Muhammad.
That's the video I watched before I tried and FAILED.
by Katganistan » Thu May 20, 2010 6:26 pm
Rambhutan wrote:This is as stupid as people who burn American flags.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aldisland, Benuty, Cannot think of a name, Deblar, Elwher, Ethel mermania, Floofybit, Gaila, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], HISPIDA, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Juristonia, Kannap, New Balkan Empire, Pale Dawn, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, Tarsonis, The Apollonian Systems, The Black Forrest, The Sinclarian Provinces, Theodorable, Valrifall, Xind
Advertisement